Innovation in executive search

The executive search industry is just over sixty years old. In that time there has been surprisingly little innovation. For example, the standard practice is for the search firm to charge a fee equal to one-third of the placed candidate’s anticipated first-year cash remuneration. That usually works fine for relatively large companies.

However, during the technology boom that ended in 2001, some search firms began to charge one-third of the placed candidate’s first-year cash remuneration and first-year equity vesting. In 2004 my former employer Heidrick & Struggles made a profit of US$128.8m on the warrants it had received in lieu of fees for placing Eric Schmidt as CEO of a start-up called Google. Eric, Larry and Sergey also seem happy with the outcome. Google is an extreme case, but it shows what can be done

Not all companies want to issue warrants to their executive search firm. Tax is also a factor. In the UK capital gains are taxed more lightly than income. My colleagues and I have been experimenting with charging a cash fee and reinvesting up to half of it in equity. We have done this when recruiting a finance director for a private company and a chief executive for a public one. The results so far are very encouraging, so we are keen to do more of it.

There’s lots of doom and gloom in the press about the European economy, and Britain in particular. However, I keep meeting entrepreneurs who are doing exciting things. It’s great fun to work with them and help to make it happen.

google-logo-vector-free-download

10 Comments » for Innovation in executive search
  1. I’ll be back again, thanks for the info.

  2. John Purkiss says:

    Thanks Briana – see you soon, JP

  3. eastlandgrl says:

    interesting, thanks

  4. aparadekto says:

    Hey, I can’t view your site properly within Opera, I actually hope you look into fixing this.

  5. Thank you for the sound critique. Me and my neighbor were just setting up to do some research about this. I am very glad to see such great info being shared freely out there.

  6. ezcardinfo says:

    Cheers to get a quite clear and useful article. I’m undoubtedly a violator of lots of these procedures. I frequently unearth myself personally conflicted when producing a blog posting because I see myself writing greater than men and women choose to learn, but I truly feel that I have to do the topic matter proper rights by thoroughly covering up it. I think that by following some of these policies I conclude up decreasing out essential aspects towards the dialogue. I guess you could have to come across a stability.

  7. Wow!, this was a top quality post. In theory I’d like to write like this as well – taking time and real effort to make a good article… but what can I say… I keep putting it off and never seem to get something finished

  8. chris stokes says:

    Nice ideas. How did you invest equity in a private company? How do you value and realise investment? It does sound a little complicated….

    • John Purkiss says:

      Thanks Chris – I can’t comment on valuation techniques on this site. However, as far as realisation is concerned, the company in question usually (a) is acquired, (b) floats on a stock exchange or (c) goes into administration. (a) and (b) can both take years.

Leave a Reply to chris stokes Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*